Otto Virtanen vs Hamad Medjedovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Virtanen has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 47.51% of points compared to Medjedovic's 45.7%. How could this influence the match outcome? Favoring Virtanen slightly in service games.
• Medjedovic excels in first serve returns with a 26.02% success rate over Virtanen’s 25.85%, though both players have very similar stats here.
• Both players are almost evenly matched under pressure, with Medjedovic saving 56.83% of breakpoints, while Virtanen saves 55.17%.
• Medjedovic has a superior win record over the past year, capturing 66.18% of his matches, whereas Virtanen has secured only 47.54%.
• Considering surface performance, Medjedovic thrives on Clay with a 67% win rate, while Virtanen excels on indoor hard courts with a 70% win rate.
• Medjedovic engages more in Challengers/ITF tournaments, where he holds a strong 72% win rate, while Virtanen competes mostly in Main tour events with a 42.11% win rate.
• In their lone previous encounter, Medjedovic defeated Virtanen on Clay, winning both sets they played.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Medjedovic has a slight advantage with a 58% win rate in these scenarios compared to Virtanen’s 52%.
• Virtanen outshines when converting breakpoints, achieving a 31.87% success rate, which is notably higher than Medjedovic’s 24.82%.

Editorial Prediction (May 7, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Medjedovic and Virtanen promises to be intensely competitive, especially given the fine margins in their past and recent performance metrics.

Medjedovic demonstrates an advantage with his solid past performance and clay court expertise, having won their previous head-to-head match on this surface. However, Virtanen's effectiveness in breakpoint conversion and slightly superior second serve performance should not be underestimated.

While Virtanen’s strength on indoor hard courts is noteworthy, this match is played on clay, where Medjedovic edges out, evidenced by both players' surface win rates.

Based on these analysis points, Medjedovic emerges as the more likely victor, mainly due to his better overall form, direct head-to-head win and experience on the clay surface.